This is uninteresting to me given he has a significant financial interest in keeping AI research going full steam ahead.

The evidence seems to be on his side, at least. RSI, ASI, AGI are all no-shows.

his takes are at least better than Ai doomerism from the 3-4 companies seeking regulatory capture in the face of open weights

says we should apply existing laws to the recent events so we can see where there may be gaps to fill

they also talk about his support for the CA billionaire's tax

(in the full interview video version)